Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54.3 | 59.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0, 2.3 | Android 4.1 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2013-05-06 |
| 5.00 x 2.60 x 0.47 inches | 5.09 x 2.66 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 4.37 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 310.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| S-LCD | TFT |
| 256 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 MSM8660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Play MSM8625 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A5 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.01 |
| Storage | |
| 1 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.72 | 5.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 3.2 | 3.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1730mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 14 hours talk time |
| 3.6 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Core is a bit better than the HTC EVO 3D, having a score of 59.7 against 54.3. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Core has a more recent 4.1 version and HTC EVO 3D has Android 4.0 version. Galaxy Core is a newer device, and it's also much lighter and thinner than HTC EVO 3D.
Galaxy Core counts with a CPU that's just as good as the HTC EVO 3D one, and although the Galaxy Core has a weaker graphics processor running at 245 MHz, they both have 1 GB of RAM memory and a Dual-Core processor. Galaxy Core counts with a little bit better screen than HTC EVO 3D, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density and a bit worse 800 x 480 resolution, they both have a same size screen.
Galaxy Core has just a bit better camera than HTC EVO 3D. Both of them have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rates and the same 720x480 video quality. The Samsung Galaxy Core features a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC EVO 3D, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 64 GB and 7 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Core counts with just a bit better battery performance than HTC EVO 3D, because it has a 1800mAh battery size instead of 1730mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Core is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.