Compare phones
HTC EVO 4G
PC36100| Global Score | |
| 50.3 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 2.3, 2.2, 2.1 | -- |
| 2010-03-23 | 2018-03-16 |
| 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.50 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| -- | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 217 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 QSD8650 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.2 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is way better than HTC EVO 4G, having an 83.3 score against 50.3. Galaxy S9 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also noticeably thinner and just a little lighter than HTC EVO 4G. The Galaxy S9 features a much better looking display than HTC EVO 4G, because it has a much better 1440 x 2960 resolution, a much better display pixel density and a way bigger display.
The Galaxy S9 features a very superior processor than HTC EVO 4G, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 3,5 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy S9 shoots much clearer photos and videos than HTC EVO 4G, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than HTC EVO 4G, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a much longer battery lifetime than HTC EVO 4G, because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity instead of 1500mAh.
The Galaxy S9 costs a little more than the HTC EVO 4G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.