Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2020-09-02 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Sonic silver |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.08 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nubia Red Magic 5S has an overall score of 76.2, which is a bit better than HTC One A9's 72.1 global score. The nubia Red Magic 5S body is newer than the HTC One A9's, although it is way heavier and a lot thicker. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little bit better looking display than HTC One A9, because although it has a bit worse number of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a really bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a superior processor than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a greater camera than HTC One A9, because it has a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, a larger aperture and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
HTC One A9 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has just 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a superior battery life than HTC One A9, because it has a 109 percent larger battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5S costs more than HTC One A9, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.