Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-09-27 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 500.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than the HTC One A9's 72.1 general score. Galaxy Fold is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than HTC One A9, but it's noticeably heavier. The HTC One A9 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen and a lot lower 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little greater number of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features much more storage to install applications and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a quite better performance than HTC One A9, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Fold features a way better battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 4380mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Fold captures better photographs and videos than HTC One A9, because although it has a lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger aperture.
Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than HTC One A9, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.