| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 81.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4 |
| 2015-11-06 | 2014-09-03 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.96 x 3.24 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 525 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.8 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6.1 | 7.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 18 hours talk time |
| 4.08 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy Note Edge is better than the HTC One A9, with a overall score of 81.7 against 72.1. Despite being the best we compare here, it must be told that it is also older, thicker and somewhat heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Edge counts with a better performance than HTC One A9, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have a 3 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note Edge also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Galaxy Note Edge has a much better looking display than HTC One A9, because it has a just a little better quantity of pixels in each inch of display, a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little bit bigger display. HTC One A9 has a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note Edge, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory, the HTC One A9 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy Note Edge counts with a much better camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with a higher 16 mega pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note Edge counts with a much longer battery lifetime than HTC One A9, because it has a 40% more battery capacity.
Galaxy Note Edge not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.