Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| 2015-11-06 | 2019-08-23 |
| 5.74 x 2.79 x 0.29 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 500.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.64 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.8 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2150mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.08 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot better than the HTC One A9, getting an 89 score against 72.1. Although the Galaxy Note10 is incredibly newer than the HTC One A9, it's a little bit thicker and heavier. The Galaxy Note10 features a better performing CPU than HTC One A9, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
The HTC One A9 and the Galaxy Note10 both count with extremely similar screens, because although the Galaxy Note10 has a quite lower number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2280px and a bigger screen. Galaxy Note10 features a superior camera than HTC One A9, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a much higher video quality and a way larger aperture to take better captures in low light environments.
The Galaxy Note10 features just a bit more memory to store more apps and games than HTC One A9, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better battery performance than HTC One A9, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note10 is a lot more expensive than HTC One A9, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.