Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2014-06-03 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gray, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| Polycarbonate | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 265.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.92 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 26.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is better than HTC One (E8), with a global score of 81.3 against 70. The LG V35 ThinQ body is a lot newer and a lot thinner than the HTC One (E8)'s, although it's just a little heavier. LG V35 ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than HTC One (E8), because it has a larger display, a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a way higher 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V35 ThinQ has a much bigger storage for applications and games than HTC One (E8), because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ has just a little better performance than HTC One (E8), because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
LG V35 ThinQ captures greater pictures and videos than HTC One (E8), because it has a much bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light images, a higher 16 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. The LG V35 ThinQ features greater battery performance than HTC One (E8), because it has a 27 percent more battery size.
LG V35 ThinQ is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.