Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | -- |
| 2014-03-25 | 2018-10-26 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 441 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XR is much better than HTC One (M8), having a overall score of 82 against 71.9. Although the iPhone XR is heavier than HTC One (M8), it's thinner and also way newer. HTC One (M8) has a better looking screen than iPhone XR, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a little higher resolution of 1920 x 1080px.
The HTC One (M8) has a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XR, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 128 GB. The iPhone XR features a bit faster processor than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores (although they are slower), 1 GB more RAM memory and a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XR takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light photos and videos, a camera in the back with way more MP, a larger sensor taking better quality photographs and videos and a lot higher (4K) video quality. The iPhone XR features a bit longer battery life than HTC One (M8), because it has 2942mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HTC One (M8), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One (M8). So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the HTC One (M8), resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.