Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Just black |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is much better than HTC One (M8), with a global score of 82.9 against 71.9. The Google Pixel 4a body is extremely newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the HTC One (M8). These phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user some additional features and performance improvements.
HTC One (M8) counts with a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has 4 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The HTC One (M8) features a little bit better display than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a just a little inferior pixels number in each inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels.
The Google Pixel 4a captures much better pictures and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos.
Google Pixel 4a counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than HTC One (M8), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Google Pixel 4a has improved battery performance than HTC One (M8), because it has a 3140mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a costs a little more money than the HTC One (M8), but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.