Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-03-25 | 2018-03-09 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is better than the HTC One (M8), getting a general score of 82.5 against 71.9. The LG V30S ThinQ design is incredibly newer, extremely thinner and a little bit lighter than the HTC One (M8). These phones use Android operating system, but the LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0, so it provides a lot of extra features and increased performance.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit faster CPU than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and more cores (although they are slower). The HTC One (M8) features a little more vivid display than LG V30S ThinQ, although it has a little bit smaller display, a just a bit lower display density and a lot worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution.
The LG V30S ThinQ has a much bigger storage for games and applications than HTC One (M8), because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory. LG V30S ThinQ has longer battery life than HTC One (M8), because it has a 27 percent more battery capacity. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much better camera than HTC One (M8), because although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor which gives a worse photo and video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture, a much higher video resolution and a way more MP back camera.
Although LG V30S ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the HTC One (M8), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One (M8). If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC One (M8), letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.