Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.36 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A25 5G has an overall score of 79.9, which is much better than the HTC One (M8)'s 71.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features. Galaxy A25 5G's design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One (M8)'s, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The HTC One (M8) has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px, it also counts with a little bit better pixel amount per inch of display. HTC One (M8) counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has 4 lesser cpu cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a way better camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a lot better (4K) video quality, a bigger aperture and a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution. Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a very superior battery performance than HTC One (M8), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.