Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Aluminium | Aluminum |
| $ 325.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than HTC One (M8), getting a global score of 88.5 against 71.9. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is notably newer and much thinner than HTC One (M8)'s, but it is also somewhat heavier. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0.
HTC One (M8) counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a really smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixels density. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit better hardware performance than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior storage for applications and games than HTC One (M8), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip has better battery performance than HTC One (M8), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 2600mAh.
Galaxy Z Flip shoots much better photos and videos than HTC One (M8), because it has a larger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a lot higher (4K) video quality, a larger aperture and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than HTC One (M8), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One (M8). So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save a couple dollars and get the HTC One (M8), letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.