Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-03-25 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.76 x 2.78 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Blue, Gold, Gray, Pink and Red | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 325.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 20 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is a lot better than HTC One (M8)'s 71.9 global score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's construction is a lot newer and notably thinner, but notably heavier than the HTC One (M8). Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a more recent 11 version and HTC One (M8) has Android 5.0, so it gives you some nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better processing power than HTC One (M8), because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores. The HTC One (M8) features a better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way smaller screen and a way lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit better amount of pixels in each inch in the screen.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior memory for games and applications than HTC One (M8), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a lot better camera than HTC One (M8), because it has a lot bigger camera sensor, a way higher 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera, a larger camera aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much longer battery life than HTC One (M8), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC One (M8), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One (M8). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and buy the HTC One (M8), resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.