Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 12 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 30 Neo has a global score of 83.1, which is just a bit better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 global score. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 30 Neo has the newer 12 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, giving you some additional features. Motorola Edge 30 Neo is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the HTC One M9.
HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU. The HTC One M9 counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1920 x 1080 pixels and a much smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density.
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo takes much better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments, a camera with a lot better resolution and better 120 fps video frame rate.
Motorola Edge 30 Neo features a very superior memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 30 Neo counts with a superior battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 42 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.