Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2023-09-14 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, having a 77.7 score against 77. HTC One M9's design is a little lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, but it is somewhat thicker and was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has older 5.0 version while Motorola Edge 40 Neo has Android 13 version.
HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixels density. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a way bigger storage to store more apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
The HTC One M9 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 processing cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a GPU and a 64 bits CPU. Motorola Edge 40 Neo counts with a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Motorola Edge 40 Neo shoots much clearer photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo also has a larger aperture, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.