Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is just a bit better than the HTC One M9, getting an 83.4 score against 77.7. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a newer 13 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it gives you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Motorola Edge 40 Pro's construction is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the HTC One M9's, although it is much heavier.
HTC One M9 counts with a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional graphics processing unit. The HTC One M9 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display and a bit lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little bit greater amount of pixels per display inch.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a larger aperture, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs, a lot higher video resolution and a lot more MP back facing camera. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity for apps and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.