Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2024-08-29 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminium | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Neo is slightly better than the HTC One M9, having an 81.9 score against 77.7. The Motorola Edge 50 Neo construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than HTC One M9. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a more recent 14 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0.
The HTC One M9 counts with an extremely better processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a bit more vivid screen than HTC One M9, because it has a larger display, a higher 1256 x 2760px resolution and a just a bit more pixels per display inch.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo takes much clearer photos and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 Neo also has a larger aperture to take better photos and video in poorly lited environments, a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a way more mega-pixels camera.
The Motorola Edge 50 Neo has a much bigger storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Neo features a way better battery duration than HTC One M9, because it has a 4310mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.