Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminium | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | P-OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.99 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than HTC One M9's general score of 77.7. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0. Although the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is notably heavier than the HTC One M9, it's somewhat thinner and also incredibly newer.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a slightly better looking display than HTC One M9, because although it has a little inferior count of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a lot larger screen and a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal memory.
HTC One M9 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bits CPU and an additional GPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light images, faster video frame rate, a way higher resolution back camera and a lot bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.