Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Oppo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Ocean |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X2 is slightly better than HTC One M9, getting a 79.7 score against 77.7. Even though the OPPO Find X2 is somewhat heavier than the HTC One M9, it's thinner and a lot newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X2 has a newer 10 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, providing you a couple additional features.
HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Find X2, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit processing unit and an additional graphics processing unit. The OPPO Find X2 features a slightly better display than HTC One M9, because it has a bit better display pixels density, a lot better 1440 x 3168 pixels resolution and a way bigger display.
OPPO Find X2 takes much better videos and photos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the OPPO Find X2 also has a bigger back camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures, better video frame rates, a way larger aperture for better low light photography and videos and a much better resolution back camera.
The OPPO Find X2 counts with much more memory to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 has a much better battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.