Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-02-22 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminium | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 441 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 is much better than the HTC One M9, with a general score of 88.1 against 77.7. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy F62 has newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, so it offers some extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy F62 is noticeably heavier than HTC One M9, it's a little thinner and noticeably newer.
HTC One M9 has a sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a little bit worse 1920 x 1080 resolution and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better amount of pixels in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than HTC One M9, because it has 96 GB more internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1 TB.
The HTC One M9 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processing unit, a 64-bits processor and a higher number of cores (but slower). The Galaxy F62 has a way better battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has a 7000mAh battery size against 2840mAh.
The Galaxy F62 takes much better photographs and videos than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Galaxy F62 also has a bigger aperture to take better images and video in low-light environments, a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.