Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2022-02-25 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 178.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the HTC One M9, having a overall score of 95.4 against 77.7. Galaxy S22 Ultra is a incredibly newer and a bit thinner device than the HTC One M9, but it's also a lot heavier. Both devices in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and HTC One M9 has Android 5.0, so it counts with lots of additional features.
HTC One M9 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with a 64-bit CPU and a graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little sharper screen than HTC One M9, because it has a lot better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a lot larger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a lot better camera than HTC One M9, because it has a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a much higher video resolution, a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and a bigger aperture. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better storage for games and applications than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 76% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC One M9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC One M9. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, otherwise you can save some money and get the HTC One M9, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.