Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-03-01 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Gray and Pink | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Aluminium | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 178.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | AMOLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.99 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro has a score of 78.3, which is slightly better than the HTC One M9's 77.7 score. The vivo X70 Pro construction is extremely newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than the HTC One M9. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X70 Pro has 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version, providing some additional features.
HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better performance than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64 bits processor. HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1920 x 1080, it also counts with a just a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch.
The vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than HTC One M9, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has higher video frame rates, a lot better 50 MP resolution back camera, a lot larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a way bigger camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photographs.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro has a really longer battery life than HTC One M9, because it has a 4450mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.