Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-10-14 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.48 x 3.25 x 0.41 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminium | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 373 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 393 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than HTC One max, getting a 91.8 score against 70.8. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's body is noticeably newer, a lot thinner and lighter than the HTC One max. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has older 11 version while HTC One max has Android 4.4.2.
HTC One max has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a bit lower screen density, a bit smaller display and a little worse 1920 x 1080 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a bit faster processor than HTC One max, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A71 5G counts with improved battery lifetime than HTC One max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Galaxy A71 5G captures greater pictures and videos than HTC One max, because it has a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a lot more megapixels back-facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also the cheapest one, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.