Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 70.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.4, 4.3 | -- |
| 2013-10-14 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.48 x 3.25 x 0.41 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 7.65 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminium | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.9 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD 3 | Super AMOLED |
| 373 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (533 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 8.82 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.56 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.03 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 393 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto Z2 Play is a bit better than HTC One max, with a 77.4 score against 70.8. The Moto Z2 Play is a incredibly newer device, and it is also notably thinner and much lighter than HTC One max. The Motorola Moto Z2 Play features a bit better CPU than HTC One max, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The HTC One max has a little more vivid display than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has a just a bit lower display density, and they both have the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the HTC One max also counts with a little larger screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Play shoots better videos and photos than HTC One max, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photography and videos in poorly lited situations and a lot more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Moto Z2 Play has a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC One max, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The HTC One max features a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
The Moto Z2 Play not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.