Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic; metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is much better than the HTC One ME, with an 84.9 score against 73.5. Even though the Apple iPhone 11 Pro is somewhat heavier than the HTC One ME, it's somewhat thinner and also a lot newer. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system, and HTC One ME works with Android 5.0 operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a much more powerful processing unit than HTC One ME, because it has a 64 bits CPU, a larger number of cores and more RAM memory. The HTC One ME features a little bit better looking screen than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit greater pixel density and a slightly better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
The HTC One ME counts with a way bigger storage to install games and applications than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 2 TB. The iPhone 11 Pro features a better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution and a smaller camera sensor shooting worse quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and video.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a bit better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 3046mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Although iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HTC One ME. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get HTC One ME, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.