Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Apple |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 8.46 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 is much better than the HTC One ME, with an 85 score against 73.5. The iPhone 8 is a notably newer device, and it is also much thinner and just a little bit lighter than HTC One ME. The HTC One ME counts with a more vivid display than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a way higher pixels count per inch of display, a little bit bigger screen and a much higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
IPhone 8 features a slightly better storage for apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Apple iPhone 8 has a better performance than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a much better camera than HTC One ME, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution, a worse (4K) video quality and a much tinier back camera sensor capturing less light and washed colors, it also counts with a larger aperture. HTC One ME has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone 8, because it has a 56 percent greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the HTC One ME. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy HTC One ME, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.