Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P has an overall score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. Even though the Google Nexus 6P and HTC One ME were released with only a few months difference, Google Nexus 6P's design is much thinner but also heavier. The HTC One ME has a sharper screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440px resolution, the HTC One ME also counts with a bit better pixels quantity per inch in the display.
HTC One ME features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has just 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 2 TB. The Google Nexus 6P counts with a little better processing power than HTC One ME, and although they both have a 3 GB RAM, the Google Nexus 6P also has a larger number of cores.
The Google Nexus 6P features better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has a 3450mAh battery size. Google Nexus 6P takes much clearer videos and photos than HTC One ME, because although it has a lot worse 12.3 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a worse (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and photos and a bigger aperture.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is way more expensive than HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the HTC One ME. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Google Nexus 6P, but if you don't you can save some money and get the HTC One ME, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.