Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.46 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V20 has a general score of 77, which is slightly better than the HTC One ME's global score of 73.5. Although LG V20 is somewhat heavier than the HTC One ME, it's incredibly thinner and also newer. The HTC One ME counts with a better looking screen than LG V20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440 resolution, the HTC One ME also counts with a little bit higher display density.
LG V20 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM and a greater number of cores (although slower). The LG V20 shoots better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a camera with a worse resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture.
The LG V20 counts with a better memory to store more apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has an external SD slot that supports 48 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory capacity. LG V20 features just a little better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the LG V20 is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.