Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| Android 5.0 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Aurora black |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is better than HTC One ME, with an 83.7 score against 73.5. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has newer 10 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, so it provides some additional features and some performance improvements. LG V50 ThinQ is a way newer and somewhat thinner cellphone than HTC One ME, but it is also somewhat heavier.
LG V50 ThinQ features a quite superior hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores and 3 GB more RAM. HTC One ME has just a bit better looking display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior storage for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB against 2 TB, it also counts with more internal storage. The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ shoots better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a smaller sensor shooting worse quality videos and photos, a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.