Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the HTC One ME's global score of 73.5. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has the previous 4.4.4 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. Even though the Motorola Droid Turbo is a better phone than the HTC One ME, we must tell that it is also somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a superior processor than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a higher number of cores and an extra graphics co-processor. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little more vivid screen than HTC One ME. They have a display of the same size, exactly the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixels number in each display inch.
The Motorola Droid Turbo shoots much better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a better resolution camera in the back and a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures.
The HTC One ME counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 32 GB internal storage capacity, the HTC One ME also has an external memory slot that allows up to 2 TB. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a way better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 2840mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola Droid Turbo is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.