Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Blue |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is a little bit better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 global score. The Motorola DROID Turbo body is heavier and thicker than HTC One ME. Both phones in this comparison work with Android operating system, but Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a slightly better display than HTC One ME. Both of them have an equal 2560 x 1440 resolution, a display with the same size and the same display density. The HTC One ME features much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that allows up to 2 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a greater hardware performance than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has 3 more CPU cores and an additional graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and videos and a camera in the back with more megapixels.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much longer battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 3900mAh battery size.
The Motorola DROID Turbo not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.