Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is much better than HTC One ME's 73.5 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. Motorola Edge 50 is a way newer and thinner phone than the HTC One ME, but it's heavier.
HTC One ME has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 5 GB lesser RAM memory and less cpu cores (although faster). HTC One ME features a little sharper screen than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher number of pixels per inch of display and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a way better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photos, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 features a slightly better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 has a really longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 76 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.