Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than HTC One ME's global score of 73.5. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but Moto G Stylus has 11 version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. Moto G Stylus's body is noticeably newer and just a little bit thinner than the HTC One ME's, although it's somewhat heavier.
The HTC One ME counts with a lot better display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and more pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has more memory for apps and games than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB against 2 TB, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Moto G Stylus features just a bit better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has a larger number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory. Moto G Stylus features a superior battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 2840mAh. Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a way bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in poorly lited situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Moto G Stylus costs more money than the HTC One ME, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.