Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic; metal | Metal and Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 565 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than HTC One ME's 73.5 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a extremely newer and a little thinner cellphone than HTC One ME, although it's noticeably heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32 comes with Android operating system, and HTC One ME works with Android 5.0 operating system.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has a little better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has a higher number of cores (but slower) and a greater amount of RAM memory. The HTC One ME counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display density and a lot better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 counts with a bit more storage for applications and games than HTC One ME, because although it has an external SD slot that allows 1 TB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy A32 takes much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A32 also has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and a back camera with a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.