Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Plastic; metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is a lot better than the HTC One ME's overall score of 73.5. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has newer 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a newer and thinner phone than the HTC One ME, but it's heavier.
Galaxy A71 5G has a superior hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. The HTC One ME has a brighter display than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A71 5G shoots a lot better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy A71 5G counts with more memory capacity to install games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds 1,02 TB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a much better battery lifetime than HTC One ME, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A71 5G is way more expensive than the HTC One ME, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.