Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2015-06-03 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and Gold |
| Plastic; metal | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a general score of 81, which is better than HTC One ME's overall score of 73.5. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, providing a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer and a lot thinner phone than HTC One ME, but it's somewhat heavier.
The HTC One ME features a much sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a much greater count of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. HTC One ME counts with a bigger memory for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 2 TB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more CPU cores and a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a much longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 41% larger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro takes a little bit better photographs and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a back camera with lesser mega-pixels resolution and a much lower 1920x1080 video resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better low-light photography and video.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.