Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-06-03 | 2019-09-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M30s has a general score of 83.3, which is much better than the HTC One ME's 73.5 score. The Galaxy M30s body is a lot newer and a little bit thinner, but somewhat heavier than HTC One ME. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy M30s has a more recent 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, counting with a lot of extra features.
Samsung Galaxy M30s has a little bit better processing power than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. HTC One ME features a more vivid display than Galaxy M30s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy M30s takes much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M30s also has a bigger camera sensor providing a higher image quality, a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos and a camera with a way better resolution.
HTC One ME features a slightly bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy M30s, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 2 TB. Samsung Galaxy M30s features a way better battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.