Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2020-03-05 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 is much better than the HTC One ME, having an 86.5 score against 73.5. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31 has a more recent 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version. The Samsung Galaxy M31 body is extremely newer and a little bit thinner, but also heavier than HTC One ME.
The Galaxy M31 has a quite superior performance than HTC One ME, because it has 3 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores (and also faster). HTC One ME counts with a better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
HTC One ME has a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 2 TB. Galaxy M31 takes much better photos and videos than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy M31 also has a way larger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a camera with much more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.