Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 14 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black and White |
| Plastic; metal | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.46 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than HTC One ME, with a general score of 77.8 against 73.5. Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is much heavier than HTC One ME, it's incredibly thinner and also incredibly newer. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a newer 14 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One ME features a way better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cores (although they are faster). The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than HTC One ME, because although it has a way worse screen density, it also counts with a lot bigger screen and a better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more memory capacity for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior battery life than HTC One ME, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a very superior camera than HTC One ME, because it has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor, a lot larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the HTC One ME, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as HTC One ME. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the HTC One ME, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.