Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Vivo |
| Android 5.0 | Android 11 |
| 2015-06-03 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic; metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.58 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.5 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a global score of 78.8, which is a bit better than HTC One ME's 73.5 general score. These phones have Android OS, but vivo X60 Pro has newer 11 version and HTC One ME has Android 5.0 version, providing some nice extra features and performance improvements. Vivo X60 Pro is a much newer and way thinner cellphone than HTC One ME, although it is also somewhat heavier.
The HTC One ME features a brighter screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better storage for games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro features a superior processor than HTC One ME, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and faster). Vivo X60 Pro counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC One ME, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity against 2840mAh. The vivo X60 Pro features a way better camera than HTC One ME, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot higher resolution back-facing camera, a bigger aperture and a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.