Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.0 | -- |
| 2015-06-03 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.38 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic; metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 2 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.80mm focal length | -- |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.58 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2840mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 598 hours standby time 23.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the HTC One ME, getting a overall score of 85.5 against 73.5. Even though Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is somewhat heavier than HTC One ME, it's a little bit thinner and incredibly newer. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a greater hardware performance than HTC One ME, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
HTC One ME has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a greater pixel density. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 takes better pictures and videos than HTC One ME, because although it has a lot less megapixels camera in the back, a tinier sensor which provides a worse photo and video quality and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a superior memory to store more games and applications than HTC One ME, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 1,75 TB smaller, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much longer battery duration than HTC One ME, because it has a 41% more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 costs a lot more money than HTC One ME, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.