Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 54 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Windows Phone 7.5 Mango | -- |
| 2011-09-01 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.74 x 2.42 x 0.43 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 4.83 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 199.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 246 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB (333 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.56 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.82 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 480 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than HTC Radar's 54 score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is incredibly newer and notably thinner than the HTC Radar's, but it is somewhat heavier. The Galaxy A50 has a much better performing CPU than HTC Radar, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
The Galaxy A50 has a more vivid screen than HTC Radar, because it has a much greater screen density, a lot bigger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy A50 counts with a lot better camera than HTC Radar, because it has a way higher video resolution, a much larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and videos and a way better 25 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A50 counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Radar, because it has 128 GB internal storage and an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much better battery lifetime than HTC Radar, because it has a 163% more battery size.
The Galaxy A50 costs a bit more money than HTC Radar, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.