Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-10-31 | 2019-03-15 |
| 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is way better than HTC Raider 4G's overall score of 60.8. Galaxy A50's construction is notably newer, just a little bit lighter and way thinner than the HTC Raider 4G. Galaxy A50 counts with a superior performance than HTC Raider 4G, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 6 more CPU cores.
The Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid display than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a lot better pixels amount per inch of display, a much bigger display and a way higher 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution. The Galaxy A50 shoots greater videos and photos than HTC Raider 4G, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A50 counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than HTC Raider 4G, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much longer battery performance than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a 147 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more than the HTC Raider 4G, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.