Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.8 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 4.0.3, 2.3.4 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2 |
| 2011-10-31 | 2013-03-14 |
| 5.07 x 2.64 x 0.44 inches | 5.38 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Polycarbonate |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 205.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 245 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S3 APQ8060 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| Scorpion (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 220 (266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 8.01 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (60 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 7.48 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 6 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1620mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 293 hours standby time 4.6 hours talk time | 17 hours talk time |
| 3.44 | 4.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S4 is a lot better than HTC Raider 4G, with a general score of 77.3 against 60.8. The Samsung Galaxy S4 is a newer phone, and it is also notably lighter and a lot thinner than the HTC Raider 4G. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S4 has a more recent 4.4.2 version while HTC Raider 4G has Android 4.0.3 version, giving you a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy S4 counts with a lot better looking display than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a lot better 1920 x 1080 resolution, much more pixels per screen inch and a quite larger screen. The Galaxy S4 has a faster processor than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a faster graphics processor working at 400 MHz, a larger number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S4 shoots much better pictures and videos than HTC Raider 4G, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S4 also has a lot better 13 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera. The Galaxy S4 counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than HTC Raider 4G, because it has 32 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S4 counts with a much better battery duration than HTC Raider 4G, because it has a 2600mAh battery size.
Galaxy S4 costs a little more money than the HTC Raider 4G, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.