Compare phones
HTC Touch CDMA
XV6900| Global Score | |
| 37.7 | 41.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 | Symbian 9.3 |
| -- | 2009-05-06 |
| 3.97 x 2.34 x 0.54 inches | 4.57 x 1.93 x 0.39 inches |
| 3.95 ounces | 3.46 ounces |
| $ 250.00 | $ 190.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.8 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 143 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7500 chipset | -- |
| Single-Core 400 MHz processor | ARM11 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor |
| 128 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 6.39 | 6.75 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 61,44 MB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 16 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.5 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 4.73 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| CDMA | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0.1 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1500mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 3.5 hours talk time | 672 hours standby time 8 hours talk time |
| 2.72 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.0, EDR |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia E52 is a little bit better than HTC Touch CDMA, with a 41.4 score against 37.7. Nokia E52 counts with Symbian 9.3 operating system, and HTC Touch CDMA comes with Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 operating system. Nokia E52 is a somewhat lighter and extremely thinner phone than the HTC Touch CDMA.
The Nokia E52 has a bit superior processor than HTC Touch CDMA. They have a Single-Core CPU. Nokia E52 features a sharper screen than HTC Touch CDMA, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same 320 x 240 pixels resolution, the Nokia E52 also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each display inch.
The Nokia E52 features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC Touch CDMA. Nokia E52 features a way better battery life than HTC Touch CDMA, because it has a 1500mAh battery size. Nokia E52 captures much better videos and photos than HTC Touch CDMA, because it has a camera in the back with a way higher resolution and a way higher 640x480 (VGA) video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Nokia E52 is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.