Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.76 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is much better than the HTC U Play's 73.5 global score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro construction is noticeably newer, but heavier and just a bit thicker than HTC U Play. The HTC U Play has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a little more vivid display than HTC U Play, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a slightly bigger storage to store more apps and games than HTC U Play, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a much better camera than HTC U Play, because it has a larger aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with way more mega pixels. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than HTC U Play, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.