Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| -- | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2017-03-01 | 2013-09-25 |
| 5.75 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.11 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Pink and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 440.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| S-LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.76 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 4.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note3 has a score of 77.7, which is just a bit better than the HTC U Play's general score of 73.5. Despite being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy Note3 is a noticeably older, heavier and a little thicker phone than HTC U Play. HTC U Play has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 1920 resolution, the HTC U Play also counts with a just a little higher pixels density.
HTC U Play features a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the HTC U Play also has 4 more cores. The HTC U Play features a lot bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 features superior battery duration than HTC U Play, because it has 3200mAh of battery capacity instead of 2500mAh. The Galaxy Note3 captures clearer pictures and videos than HTC U Play, because although it has a back-facing camera with less mega-pixels and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.