Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-02-21 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, with an 82.5 score against 77. The LG V30S ThinQ body is newer, just a bit lighter and a bit thinner than HTC U Ultra. LG V30S ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster).
LG V30S ThinQ has a slightly better looking screen than HTC U Ultra, because it has a bit larger screen, a little higher 1440 x 2880 resolution and a quite better number of pixels in each screen inch. The LG V30S ThinQ features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more internal storage.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity. The HTC U Ultra and the LG V30S ThinQ both have incredibly similar cameras, because although the LG V30S ThinQ has a lot smaller sensor, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a much better 16 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light photos and video.
LG V30S ThinQ is more expensive than HTC U Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.