Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | LG |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2020-03-20 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 749.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V60 ThinQ is much better than the HTC U Ultra, getting a global score of 87.6 against 77. The LG V60 ThinQ construction is newer, but somewhat thicker and notably heavier than the HTC U Ultra. LG V60 ThinQ has a little faster processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores.
HTC U Ultra features a little sharper display than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better quantity of pixels per screen inch. LG V60 ThinQ features a slightly better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same aperture, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a way better photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The LG V60 ThinQ features a bigger memory for games and applications than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB, the LG V60 ThinQ also has 128 GB internal memory. LG V60 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 67 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V60 ThinQ not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.