Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2017-02-21 | 2023-05-04 |
| 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Eclipse Black, Lunar Blue, Nebula Green and Viva Magenta |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 749.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| S-LCD 5 | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8020 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 40 is slightly better than HTC U Ultra, having a overall score of 77.2 against 77. The Motorola Edge 40 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also a little thinner and a little lighter than the HTC U Ultra. The Motorola Edge 40 has a bit sharper display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a little bit larger screen.
The HTC U Ultra features a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 40, although it has lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory. Motorola Edge 40 shoots better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 40 also has a much larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much bigger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The HTC U Ultra features much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 40 counts with a superior battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.